Capitation Payments: Definition, How They Work, and Calculation

Julia Kagan is a financial/consumer journalist and former senior editor, personal finance, of Investopedia.

Updated September 28, 2023 Reviewed by Reviewed by Thomas J. Catalano

Thomas J Catalano is a CFP and Registered Investment Adviser with the state of South Carolina, where he launched his own financial advisory firm in 2018. Thomas' experience gives him expertise in a variety of areas including investments, retirement, insurance, and financial planning.

What Are Capitation Payments?

Capitation payments are payments agreed upon in a capitated contract by a health insurance company and a medical provider. They are fixed, pre-arranged monthly payments received by a physician, clinic, or hospital per patient enrolled in a health plan, or per capita. The monthly payment is calculated one year in advance and remains fixed for that year, regardless of how often the patient needs services.

Key Takeaways

How Capitation Payment Plans Work

Rates for capitation payments are developed using local costs and average utilization of services, and therefore, can vary from one region of the country to another. Many plans establish risk pools as a percentage of the capitation payment.

Money in this risk pool is withheld from the physician until the end of the fiscal year. If the health plan does well financially, the medical provider receives this money; if the health plan does poorly, the money is kept to pay the deficit expenses.

The amount of the capitation will be determined, in part, by the number of services provided and will vary from health plan to health plan. Most capitation payment plans for primary care services include basic areas of healthcare:

There are two types of capitation relationships. The first is where the provider is paid directly by the insurer, also called a primary capitation. Then, a secondary capitation is where another provider (such as a lab or medical specialist) is paid out of the provider’s funds.

Another form of capitation may encourage preventative health services. With capitations that encourage preventative care, the provider is rewarded for providing preventive health care services. This incentivizes the doctor or provider to help avoid expensive medical services.

Capitation agreements will provide a list of specific included services in the contract.

Capitation is meant to help limit excessive costs and the performance of unnecessary services. But on the downside, it might also mean that patients get less facetime with the doctor. Providers may look to increase profitability under the capitation model by cutting down on the time that patients see the doctor.

Compared with the capitation alternative, fee-for-service (FFS), it’s supposed to be more cost-effective, hence the reason providers look to limit face time with doctors. FFS pays providers based on the number of services provided—unlike capitations that pay based on the number of participants in the group. Studies from many years suggest capitation is more cost-effective among groups that have a high amount of individuals with moderate health care needs.

At the same time, it’s been shown that capitation systems encourage doctors to reduce services. A Center for Studying Health System Change study found that 7% of doctors in a capitation system reduce services because there’s financial incentive to do so.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Capitation Payments

Capitation payments have various advantages when it comes to the alternative—FFS. However, some providers may still opt for FFS given its advantages over capitation.

Advantages of Capitation

The alternative to capitation payments is FFS, where providers are paid based on the number of services provided. Perhaps the biggest benefit to capitation contracts is that they provide fixed payments to providers, dissuading the incentive to order more procedures than necessary, which can be an issue with FFS (i.e. capitation provides greater provider accountability).

As well, the fixed payments by capitation offer greater financial certainty for providers. They can focus on face-to-face services and explore cost-effective care that provides the best treatment. Along those lines, providers have a greater incentive to encourage preventative care.

Disadvantages of Capitation

On the downside, a capitation arrangement can lead providers to opt for less expensive drugs or procedures. That is, providers opt to not use name-brand products to save money. Capitation can also encourage providers to enroll large numbers of patients, which can lead to short visits for patients and long wait times.

Financial risk for patients with major medical issues is borne by the provider in the case of capitation agreements. In higher population areas, the capitation rates might be on the low side. In those circumstances, the provider may supplement the capitation model with FFS.